Legal Opinion
Sequoia Union High School District v. Aurora Charter High School
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 2003No. A100952PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Sequoia Union High School District (Sequoia) appeals a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate that commands Sequoia to provide Aurora Charter High School (Aurora) educational facilities sufficient to accommodate the Aurora students who live in the Sequoia district. Sequoia contends it is not responsible for providing the facilities because it did not sponsor Aurora and because Aurora has not demonstrated that its student body is comprised of the statutory requisite number of students residing in the Sequoia district to qualify for facilities.
BACKGROUND
The Charter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- McGill v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Miller Family Home, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Indian Model Schools v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. HellikerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ridgecrest Charter School v. Sierra Sands Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Los Angeles International Charter High School v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.