Legal Opinion
Ridgecrest Charter School v. Sierra Sands Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2005No. F045114PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
The Charter Schools Act of 1992 (Ed. Code, § 47600 et seq. (the Act)), 1 as amended by Proposition 39 in November of 2000, requires public school districts to make their educational facilities available to charter schools operating in the district. The facilities provided must be sufficient to accommodate all the charter school’s in-district students under conditions “reasonably equivalent” to those the students would have if they were attending a noncharter school in the same district. (§ 47614, subd. (b).) The facilities must also be “contiguous,” meaning they must be on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Monzon v. Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McLeod v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gananian v. WagstaffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ellena v. Department of InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- American Board of Cosmetic Surgery v. Medical BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Los Angeles International Charter High School v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.