Legal Opinion

Gould v. Winokur

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 5, 1969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

104 N.J. Super. 329 (1969)

250 A.2d 38

ELMER GOULD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

GERALD WINOKUR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 19, 1968.

Decided February 5, 1969.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. Seymour B. Jacobs argued the cause for appellant (Messrs, Balk, Jacobs, Goldberger & Mandell, attorneys).

Mr. H. Curtis Meanor argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

This medical-surgical malpractice case was tried before a jury. The claim of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gould v. WinokurNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Brown v. Racquet Club of BricktownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Klimko v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Cuthbertson v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API