Abdullah v. Kennet

Appellant, ‘Omar ‘Abdullah, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985 and refusal to exercise pendant jurisdiction over his state law claims. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and we affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Gertner in her October 25, 2002 Memorandum and Order.

Regarding his due process claim, Appellant contests that the Parratt-Hudson doctrine is the appropriate analysis to apply to his alleged deprivation of a liberty interest. Appellant is misguided. The Parratt-Hudson line of…