Legal Opinion

Nieves v. McSweeney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 27, 2001No. 00-1110PublishedCited by 263 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, Angel Nieves and his eighteen-year-old daughter Rebecca, claim to be victims of police brutality. They waited a considerable period of time before bringing suit, however, and the district court turned them away, partially on timeliness grounds and partially for failure to proffer a federally-cognizable claim. Their appeal contends that the lower court misunderstood both the operation of the statute of limitations in civil conspiracy cases and the circumstances under which 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides a vehicle for the maintenance of malicious prosecution…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by263 opinions

  1. Centro Medico Del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano De MelecioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Burrell v. Hampshire CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Freeman v. Town of HudsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. Bielanski v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Castellano v. FragozoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API