Claim of Schechter v. State Insurance Fund
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Conway.
Two issues are presented here: (1) do the facts and circumstances warrant the finding made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board that the claimant sustained an accidental injury within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law when he suffered a heart attack, and (2) assuming such, is there sufficient medical evidence presented to sustain the finding of fact made by the board that the heart attack was causally related to his activities as a trial counsel? We have concluded that both questions must be answered in the affirmative and, therefore, that the order of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Claim of Masse v. James H. Robinson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Williams v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Loewinthan v. Le VineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Cannon v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johannesen v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Middleton v. Coxsackie Correctional FacilityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Currie v. Town of DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- CITY & CTY. OF DENVER v. Indus. CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Grace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.