Legal Opinion
Loewinthan v. Le Vine
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1949PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loughran, Ch. J.
The action is for slander. The issue has been tried three times. On the first trial, the Trial Judge set aside a verdict for the plaintiff as contrary to the weight of the evidence and as excessive, and the Appellate Division affirmed that order. (2G3 App. Div. 982.) On the second trial, the plaintiff again had a verdict, but the Appellate Division reversed the judgment on the grounds that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and was excessive. (270 App. Div. 512.) On the third trial, the jury again found for the plaintiff and again the verdict was set aside; but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pecue v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Bingham v. . GaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Loewinthan v. Le VineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Loewinthan v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by34 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Stukuls v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Garson v. HendlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Curiale v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.