Legal Opinion
Lee v. Lee
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1987PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Chief Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff, Cynthia G. Lee, complied with the notice provisions of an insurance policy affording uninsured motorist coverage on her husband’s automobile. The trial court held that the plaintiff had not complied with the provisions and that there was no coverage. The Court of Appeals reversed.
On July 17, 1981, the plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile owned and driven by her brother-in-law, defendant Steve W. Lee, when that vehicle was “run off” the road by a second automobile, driven by defendant Jeff Beeler. As a result of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- INA Insurance Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Hearn, Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CreasyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Transamerica Insurance Co. v. ParrottCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Kellum v. Pacific National Fire Ins. CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Lawler v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Hospital Underwriting Group, Inc. v. Summit Health Ltd., Sarahmarge Crigler, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- North River Insurance Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Allstate Insurance v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.