Legal Opinion

Adams v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 28, 2003No. 2:02-cv-73954PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING HABEAS CORPUS PETITION

TARNOW, District Judge.

Petitioner Steve Adams, Jr., has filed an application for the writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner attacks his state court convictions for criminal sexual conduct (CSC). Respondent urges the Court through counsel to deny the habeas petition. For the reasons that follow, the Court has concluded that the habeas petition must be denied.

I.Background

On July 22, 1998, a circuit court jury in Wayne County, Michigan found Petitioner guilty of two counts of first-degree CSC, MiCH. Comp. Laws § 750.520b(l)(h)(i) (sexual penetration of…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hammer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Ware v. HarryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. Brown v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. Pillette v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. McGowan v. ChristiansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API