Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Southern California Edison 401(k) Savings Plan

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 14, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01296Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MILISSA ANN SARGENT, Case No. 20-cv-1296-MMA (RBB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN, et al., 15 [Doc. No. 8] Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Milissa Ann Sargent (“Plaintiff”) alleges three causes of action: (1) an Employee 20 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) claim for benefits pursuant to 29 21 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); (2) an ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claim pursuant to 29

22 U.S.C. §§ 1104,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API