Legal Opinion

Wimpfheimer v. Perrine

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 10, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Heard on bill, supplemental bill, answers, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

Complainants are judgment and execution creditors of the defendant Perrine, and file their bill and supplemental bill to *127establish, as creditors, under four executions, a lien upon personal property in the possession of the defendant Stagg, as assignee of Perrine, under the Assignment act for the benefit of creditors. The assignment was made previous to the issuing of execution on any of complainants’ judgments, and previous to the recovery of all of the four judgments, except one for $167, which was recovered on the same day the assignment was made. Previous to the execution of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sweet v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Knowles Loom Works v. VacherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
  3. Bruce v. PearsallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayer v. RankinUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Osco Motors Corp. v. MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  3. Bell v. KatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API