Mayer v. Rankin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from a judgment dismissing his complaint in which was alleged six causes of action. Both of the defendants were served with summons. Defendant Rankin did not answer or otherwise plead to the complaint. He has not filed a brief on this appeal. The defendant Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, hereinafter referred to as respondent, filed1 a special and general demurrer to each of the six causes of action set out in the complaint. The demurrers were sustained and leave granted to amend. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Traer v. ClewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Warner v. FlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. WightmanUtah Supreme Court · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Russell/Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- McBreen v. Iceco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. Shaun S. Adel & Consumer Protection Group, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Jones v. ComerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.