Legal Opinion

Prairie v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 9, 1984No. 339-83TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

This case comes before the court, without oral argument, on defendant’s motion to dismiss.1 Defendant’s motion is grounded on the contention that plaintiff’s complaint is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Plaintiffs, appearing pro se, have filed a document, which has been treated as a complaint, that is most sketchy and somewhat unclear. As best the court can determine, the gist of this “complaint” challenges the validity of two levy (seizure) actions taken by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in furtherance of collecting from plaintiffs certain income taxes owed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  3. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. James W. Clinton v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Sterner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API