Prairie v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This case comes before the court, without oral argument, on defendant’s motion to dismiss.1 Defendant’s motion is grounded on the contention that plaintiff’s complaint is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
Plaintiffs, appearing pro se, have filed a document, which has been treated as a complaint, that is most sketchy and somewhat unclear. As best the court can determine, the gist of this “complaint” challenges the validity of two levy (seizure) actions taken by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in furtherance of collecting from plaintiffs certain income taxes owed the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- James W. Clinton v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Sterner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984