Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Blum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McAtee, J.:

This was an action begun on the 18th day-of May, 1892, by the plaintiffs below, defendants in. error here, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover the amount due upoD three several promissory notes and upon an open account aggregating1 tbe sum of five thousand, four hundred and seventy-five ■dollars and forty-six cents.

The notes were executed at Texarkana, Texas, September 1, 1886, for the sum of one thousand, five hundred and seventeen dollars and thirty-four cents, payable ninety days after date with twelve per cent,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cornwell v. MeginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Johnson v. RumseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Haubert v. MausshardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Black v. De CampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Martin v. Leeper Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Tulsa Ice Co. v. LileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Klinkoosten v. MundtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API