Legal Opinion

Macaulay v. Malt-Diastase Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 1925No. 1722PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in a trade-mark interference, involving the right to register the word “Liberty” as a trade-mark for use on malt extract or malt compound, to be employed in the preparation of a beverage.

The Malt Company's testimony discloses that its first use of the mark was on a shipment of goods in interstate commerce March 29, 1919. The testimony of four witnesses, on behalf of appellant, Macaulay, establishes use of the mark in the early part of March, 1919. One witness testified to its use as early as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New England Duplicating Co., Inc. v. MendesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  2. Geo. Washington Mint, Inc. v. Washington Mint, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. Jim Dandy Co. ex rel. Western Grain Co. v. Martha White Foods, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Travelodge Corporation v. SiragusaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1964
  5. Continental Distilling Corporation v. Old Charter Distillery Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API