Legal Opinion
Medi-Flex, Inc. v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 7, 2006No. CIV.A. 06-2015-KHVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Medi-Flex, Inc. (“Medi-Flex”) brings suit against Nice-Pak Products, Inc. and Professional Disposables, Inc., its healthcare division, (collectively, “Nice-Pak”) for trademark infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125. This matter is before the Court on MediFlex, Inc. ’s Motion For Preliminary Injunction to prevent Nice-Pak from using the name “Chlorascrub” during the pendency of this case. See Doc. #3 filed January 24, 2006. On March 1, 2006, the parties presented oral argument…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Universal Money Centers, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Universal BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Gte Corporation v. David R. Williams, D/B/A General TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Therma-Scan, Inc. v. Thermoscan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Endosurg Medical, Inc. v. Endomaster Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- White v. Alcon Film Fund, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Western Wisconsin Water, Inc. v. Quality Beverages of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007