Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Blue Cross of Northeastern Pennsylvania
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 1990No. Civ. A. Nos. 89-1969, 89-1972PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
ZIEGLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 1990, upon motion of defendant, Joseph Ichter, M.D., to reconsider order of April 26, 1990,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration be and hereby is denied for the following reasons:
1) Remand of a case to state court is a nondispositive action.
2) The appropriate standard of review by a district court for nondispositive actions taken by a magistrate is to determine whether the report and recommendations of the magistrate were clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
3) After reviewing the record that is before the court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward Trucking Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, and Avram Cohen v. Reverend Gerald GordonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Vaquillas Ranch Co. v. Texaco Exploration & ProductionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- TM Marketing, Inc. v. Art & Antiques Associates, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.