Cox v. Lesko
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Gernon, J.:
Kimberly R. Cox appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Dr. Paul Lesko in a medical malpractice action.
The jury found 70% of the fault attributable to Cox and 30% attributable to Dr. Lesko. Cox contends on appeal that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to consider her failure to attend physical therapy as evidence of comparative fault. She also argues that the trial court erred in limiting the cross-examination of one of Dr. Lesko’s expert witnesses.
After suffering a shoulder injury at work, Cox was referred to Dr. Lesko, who diagnosed her as suffering from traumatic…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Blair v. EblenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Wisker Ex Rel. Wisker v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Delaney v. CadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nold Ex Rel. Nold v. BinyonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Schlaikjer v. KaplanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Cox v. LeskoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Hart v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Estate of Mills Ex Rel. Mills v. MangosingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010