Legal Opinion

Schlaikjer v. Kaplan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 2013No. 98,932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Donna Schlaikjer seeks reversal of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant James D. Kaplan, M.D. Schlaikjer sued Kaplan for medical malpractice arising out of surgeries to treat her tracheal stenosis. Kaplan filed a successful motion in limine to prevent Schlaikjer’s subsequent treating physician and designated expert, Joel Cooper, M.D., from testifying about the standard of care. The district court granted the motion in limine because Cooper did not meet the requirements of K.S.A. 60-3412. In the absence of expert testimony on the standard of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Thompson v. KFB InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. InghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. Sierra Club v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Biglow v. EidenbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API