Legal Opinion

Carlsen v. Hay

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 10, 1921No. 9748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for specific performance of an alleged contract for sale of real estate. Judgment in damages for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of Larimer County, Hon. George H. Bradfield, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action was by the defendants in error to compel the specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real estate.

The defendants in error, plaintiffs below, lived in Larimer County, Colorado, and the plaintiff in error resided at Loup City, Nebraska. The land had been listed for sale by the defendant with Carl Anderson, a real estate agent at Fort Collins, Colorado.

The contract relied upon grew out of certain letters and telegrams exchanged between Anderson and defendant Carlsen. These were as follows:

“Fort Collins, Colo.

June 21, 1918.

C. C. Carlsen,

Loup City, Neb.

Have offer of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. W. T. Craft Realty Co. v. LivernashColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Shea v. Second Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Pierce v. Marland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Hall v. GehrkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API