Legal Opinion

State v. Perryman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 2015No. 13CR00031; A155733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for misdemeanor driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol content (BAC) obtained through a warrantless, nonconsen-sual blood draw conducted at a hospital. We conclude that exigent circumstances justified the seizure of defendant’s blood, and, therefore, we affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. At approximately 1:04 a.m., police received a tip from an employee of a tavern that defendant had driven away from the tavern…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Glorianna WoodardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. PortulanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. Jessica M. RandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API