State v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether time spent in a drug rehabilitation program as a condition of probation is time spent “in custody” within the meaning of the statute which mandates credit against a sentence of imprisonment for presentence incarceration. We hold that when a defendant is *581confined in such a program under conditions which the trial court finds are as onerous and as restrictive on movement and conduct as those a defendant would experience if he were in jail, a defendant is entitled to credit for such time if he is later sentenced to imprisonment.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. RamosIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Pennington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- People v. StangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Balderston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. MuratellaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992