Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 26, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 89-612PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether time spent in a drug rehabilitation program as a condition of probation is time spent “in custody” within the meaning of the statute which mandates credit against a sentence of imprisonment for presentence incarceration. We hold that when a defendant is *581confined in such a program under conditions which the trial court finds are as onerous and as restrictive on movement and conduct as those a defendant would experience if he were in jail, a defendant is entitled to credit for such time if he is later sentenced to imprisonment.

FACTS

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. RamosIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Pennington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. People v. StangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Balderston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. State v. MuratellaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API