Legal Opinion
People v. Harrison
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1988No. A036918PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Carlos Harrison, the appellant, claims the trial court improperly revoked his probation on the basis of evidence that should have been excluded. On appeal, he asks this court to disapprove of People v. Hayko (1970) 7 Cal.App.3d 604 [86 Cal.Rptr. 726], which held that the exclusionary rule does not usually apply in probation revocation hearings. He asserts that the Harvey-Madden rule should have applied to his hearing even if the exclusionary rule should not. (People v. Harvey (1958) 156 Cal.App.2d 516 [319 P.2d 689]; People v. Madden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 1017 [88 Cal.Rptr. 171,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. LoyaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. LazloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. RacklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In re C.C. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.