Legal Opinion
People v. Racklin
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 2011No. Nos. A128857, A128858PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*874Opinion
MARGULIES, J.
Defendant Leroy Racklin appeals from a judgment imposing a four-year term in state prison following the revocation of his probation. He contends the trial court erred in considering evidence in the revocation hearing of an admission elicited from him by police officers in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602] (Miranda). We find the Miranda exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings, and defendant failed in any event to meet his burden of proving prejudice. We therefore affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. LazloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Vanleer CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015