Legal Opinion
Hines v. Wilkinson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 28, 1995No. C2-92-668PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.
This prisoner civil rights case is set for trial on September 5, 1995. It is a consent *264ease. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(e). The matter is now before the Court for a ruling on defendants’ motion, made pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(c)(5), to exclude plaintiff, Paul Hines, from attending personally certain depositions which have been scheduled in this ease. For the following reasons, the motion for a protective order will be denied.
I
As more fully set forth in prior orders of this court and in an order issued by the Court of Appeals on August 10,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Gary William Holt v. Jerry Pitts, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Gary William Holt v. Jerry Pitts, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Roger Collins v. Robert O. Francis, Warden, Ga. Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Lee v. Denver Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Applied Predictive Technologies, Inc. v. MarketDial, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Cornelius v. Marion, IllinoisDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.