A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Case Shingle & Lumber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellant sued respondents to recover upon a promissory note dated January 14,1924, in the sum of $2,186.04, together with interest, attorney’s fees and costs. The complaint was in the usual form of such actions.
Respondent Pacific Cedar Company, by answer, admitted the execution and delivery of the note as alleged, but put in issue all the other allegations of the complaint.
Respondent Case Shingle & Lumber Company, by answer, admitted the execution and delivery of the note as alleged, denied that it was given for a valuable, or any, consideration, denied that no payments had been made thereon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conkling v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Churchill v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Hausken v. Hodson-Feenaughty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Johns v. JaycoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Long v. Five-Hundred Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sound Built Homes, Inc. v. Windermere Real Estate/South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934