Legal Opinion

Sakovich v. Dodt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 22, 1988No. 3-87-0757PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

Plaintiff Lorene Sakovich appeals pro se from the dismissal of her complaint for damages allegedly resulting from defendant Dr. Bruce Dodt’s medical misdiagnosis and other alleged misconduct in connection with a work-related injury to plaintiff’s hand. Plaintiffs pro se complaint was dismissed by the circuit court of Kankakee County with prejudice for failure to comply with section 2 — 622 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 622). Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal on grounds that plaintiff has failed to comply with Supreme Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lyon v. Hasbro Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Biggs v. SpaderIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Bloom v. GuthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Bassett v. WangAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. McAlister v. SchickIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Ebbing v. PrenticeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API