Legal Opinion

Aultman Co. v. McDonough

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Marquette county: R. G-. Siebeckeb, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

It appears from the record that July 16, 1898, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant a rebuilt second-hand separator, and a ten-horse Star engine on trucks, with the usual' fixtures and extras, for $650, of which $200 was paid down in cash, and three notes, of $150 each, secured by chattel mortgage on the property, taken for the balance; that after using the same for some time the engine was found to be unsatisfactory to the defendant, and so it was returned, and a rebuilt G-aar-Scott engine taken in its place, with an agreement on the part of the defendant to pay to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Plow Works v. Niles & Scott Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harrison v. Juneau BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Gage v. WaylandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Gunn v. MadiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Hill v. MerrimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McArthur v. MoffetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Wolf Co. v. KutchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Armour v. SeixasWashington Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API