Legal Opinion

Fritsch v. City of Chula Vista

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 14, 1999No. 98-CV-0972-E(CGA)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AARON, United States Magistrate Judge.

I

Introduction

Plaintiff Ruth Fritsch was employed as an Assistant City Attorney for the City of Chula Vista from 1988 until August of 1997, when she was terminated for refusing to submit to a psychiatric evaluation ordered by Defendant Kaheny, the City Attorney of Chula Vista. At the time of the Plaintiffs termination, Defendant Moore was Senior Assistant City Attorney and Defendant Emerson was the Director of Human Resources for the City.

At his deposition, Defendant Kaheny agreed that the Plaintiff had been an excellent employee, and had…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Simpson v. University of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
  2. Fitzgerald v. CassilDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. California Psychiatric TransitionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Stevenson v. Stanley Bostitch, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API