Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. Cassil
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 31, 2003No. C-02-3857 EMCPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS SEEKING PLAINTIFFS’ MEDICAL AND PSYCHOTHERAPY RECORDS (Docket No. 32)
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Patrick Fitzgerald, Daniel Yu, and their adopted son, Declan Fitzgerald-Yu (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Robert Cassil, Hawthorne/Stone Real Estate Investments, Inc., and Donald Simmons (collectively “Defendants”) for, inter alia, violation of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3604, and various state laws. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have discriminated against them on the basis of familial status. In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cabrera v. JakabovitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Roberts v. Clark County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Koch, Randolph v. Cox, ChristopherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peters' BakeryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Simpson v. University of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.