Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Hansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1978No. 15605Published

1DissentMaughan, Justice

For the following reasons, I dissent. The evidence adduced and precedential case law, in my view, require affirmance of the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners.

*809The matter was heard by three honorable and learned men, Carman E. Kipp, Esq., Chairman, David W. Sorenson, Esq., and the Honorable Calvin Gould, a judge of the district court. All are members of the Board of Commissioners. The assessment of the evidence as reflected in the findings of fact by these examiners merits serious consideration. The recommendation of the examiners, which was approved and adopted by the Board of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re BridwellUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re FullmerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re MacFarlaneUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re BadgerUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In re HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API