Legal Opinion
State v. Bodtmann
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 6, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
248 N.J. Super. 100 (1990)
590 A.2d 259
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARILYN BODTMANN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.
Decided July 6, 1990.
David J. Nathanson for plaintiff.
Richard Kraus for defendant.
MINUSKIN, J.S.C.
This matter is before the court on remand from the Appellate Division. The pivotal issue presented is whether the patient-physician privilege, as defined under N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.2, is applicable to a drunk-driving charge under the State's Motor Vehicle Act. The general factual situation has been detailed in State v. Bodtmann, 239 N.J. Super.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. MacUkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- State v. BrileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SzempleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Todd v. South Jersey Hospital SystemDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- State v. SzempleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994