Legal Opinion

State v. Szemple

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

135 N.J. 406 (1994)

640 A.2d 817

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

CRAIG SZEMPLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 12, 1993.

Decided May 12, 1994.

George T. Daggett, argued the cause for appellant (Daggett & Kraemer, attorneys).

Joseph Connor, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (W. Michael Murphy, Jr., Morris County Prosecutor, attorneys).

J. Michael Blake, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for amicus curiae Public Defender (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).

Catherine A. Foddai, Deputy Attorney General,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API