Legal Opinion

Ripley v. Anderson Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 3, 1946No. 15896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Tayror

delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which claimant was awarded twenty-five (25%) per cent, functional loss of use of the right eye, ten (10%) per cent, functional loss of use of the left eye, and One Thousand ($1,000.00), Dollars for disfigurement.

The claimant, Carl T. Ripley, while employed in the machine shop of the Anderson Cotton Mills of Anderson, South Carolina, received injuries as the result of an explosion which blew him completely from the building, as a result of which he filed claim for injuries to his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Green v. City of BennettsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Branch v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Parrott v. Barfield Used PartsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  5. Lanford v. Clinton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Yeager v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Roper v. Kimbrell's of Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Hoke v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Bundrick v. Powell's Garage & Wreckage ServiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API