Legal Opinion

Lanford v. Clinton Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 1944No. 15639PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Tayror

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:

This is .an appeal from the Court 'of Common Pleas of Laurens County, South Carolina, arising out of the following statement of facts:

On February 3, 1943, while employed by Clinton Cotton Mills, Clinton, S. C., the claimant, Grover P. Lanford, had a fight with one Lindsey Heaton, and Heaton bit off a portion of one of Lanford’s ears.

Lanford filed a claim with the South Carolina Industrial Commission, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, for serious head and facial disfigurement. -A hearing was held before Commissioner…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Green v. City of BennettsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Gallman v. Springs MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  5. Tedars v. Savannah River Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Radcliffe v. Southern Aviation SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. Hiers v. BRUNSON CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Buff v. Columbia Baking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Young v. Sonoco Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Kinsey v. Champion American Service CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API