Legal Opinion

Molony v. Shalom Et Benedictus

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 17, 1980No. 1318, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

Md. Ann. Code art. 101, § 39 (a) provides that the failure of an employee to file his claim for workmen’s compensation benefits within two years from the date of the compensable accident "shall constitute a complete bar to any claim under [the Workmen’s Compensation law].” Appellant missed the deadline by 17 days; the accident occurred February 10, 1971, but his claim was not filed until February 27, 1973. Thus, the Workmen’s Compensation Commission and, on appeal, the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, rejected his claim.

Appellant seeks relief from this "complete bar” by interposing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas v. American Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Renco, Inc. v. NunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Walls v. Howard County Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Inner Harbor Warehouse, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS'S FUND v. LutterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Lutter v. Lutter Construction, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS'S FUND v. LutterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API