Legal Opinion

UNINSURED EMPLOYERS'S FUND v. Lutter

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 1996No. 58, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether officers of Maryland close corporations, who decide not to purchase workers’ compensation insurance for themselves but fail to notify the State of their decision and are subsequently injured working for the corporation, may collect workers’ compensa*337tion benefits from the state-operated Uninsured Employers’ Fund. We hold that uninsured close corporation officers are not “covered employees” under the Workers’ Compensation Act when they decide, in their capacity as corporate officers, not to carry insurance for themselves and they fail…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Price v. HitafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Chase v. JeniferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Board of Trustees of the Maryland State Retirement & Pension Systems v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Inner Harbor Warehouse, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. DannerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. W.M. Schlosser Co. v. Uninsured Employer's FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Granite State Insurance v. HernandezCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. W.M. Schlosser Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. DannerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API