Legal Opinion
Vannata v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 5, 1923No. 120PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1] The “amended assignment of errors” is open to all the objections enumerated in Fraina v. United States, 255 Fed. 28, 30, 166 C. C. A. 356. It is therefore disregarded, as was a similar document in Schonfeld v. United States (C. C. A.) 277 Fed. 934, 939.
The errors assigned in accordance with rule at the time of taking writ of error do not present in proper form any arguable point, and we have therefore examined this record for plain error not assigned, in accordance with the practice often set forth, but last stated in Gruher v. United States, 255 Fed.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. DietrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1904
- Feder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Gebardi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- United States v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Commonwealth v. FavulliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.