Legal Opinion

Biegler v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 13, 1936No. 5684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant advances two reasons for reversal of that portion of the judgment which sentenced him to imprisonment for the violation of title 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. He questions the sufficiency of the evidence which showed possession of unstamped morphine hydrochloride and heroin hydrochloride, to justify conviction under said section for receiving, etc., the drug knowing the same to have been unlawfully imported.

The authorities do not sustain appellant’s position.a,b

The attempted distinction which appellant makes — namely, that the decision in Yee Hem v. U. S., 268 U.S. 178, 45…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Parmagini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  4. Hood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Mullaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herman Carter Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API