Baxter v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Commissioner Hobson
Affirming.
The city of Louisville began this proceeding against Dr. W. E. Baxter to condemn, for wharf purposes, a tract of land containing 24.247 acres, lying on the Ohio river below Louisville. The jury fixed the value of the land at $12,123. The court entered judgment pursuant to the verdict. Dr. Baxter appeals.
The proceeding was bad under section 2831, Kentucky Statutes, which provides as follows:
“Whenever property shall be needed for appropriate municipal purposes, either within the boundaries of the city or the county, the board of public works,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Warden v. Madisonville, H. & E. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Greasy Creek Min'l Co. v. Ely Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Reed v. Louisville Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Inland Waterways Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- State v. 0.62033 Acres of Land in Christiana HundredSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Greenup County, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- McGee v. City of WilliamstownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- City of Eugene v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.