Owen v. Meade
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe HaveN, J.
The plaintiff sues as the assignee of one Grady to recover the sum of $950, balance alleged to be due for professional services rendered by the said Grady in the prosecution of a certain action brought by the defendant against the county of Fresno. The complaint, which is unverified, alleges that the defendant expressly agreed to pay to said Grady for such services the sum of $1,000, and also alleges that the services so rendered by Grady were reasonably worth the sum of $1,000. The answer contains a general denial, and in addition sets out a separate defense in which it is alleged “that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stiles v. HookerNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Ellis v. WoodburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stout v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Tomlinson v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Greve v. Echo Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Bailey v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.