Legal Opinion
Virginia Vermiculite, Ltd. v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided July 26, 2000No. Civil Action 3:96CV00012, 3:96CV00013, 3:95CV00015PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, Senior District Judge.
These consolidated actions come before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having thoroughly considered the substantial briefing and evidence provided by the parties, and having heard oral argument from counsel on the motions, and for the reasons hereinafter set forth, the court shall GRANT the plaintiffs’ motion in part, DENY the plaintiffs’ motion in part, GRANT the defendants’ motions in part, and DENY the defendants’ motions in part. As a result of this Memorandum…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kondaurov v. KerdashaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Burke v. Catawba HospitalCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Giganti v. Gen-X Strategies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Virginia Vermiculite Ltd. v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.