Legal Opinion

Myers v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1934No. 13802PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

March 12, 1934. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The first trial of this case, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, was reversed by this Court, and the case remanded to the County Court of Florence County for a new trial. See Myers v. A.C.L. Railroad Co., 169 S.C. 310,168 S.E., 730. We held that, under the terms of Section 8356 of the Code, a railroad company was not required to maintain at a road crossing two crossing signs, but that one such sign, erected in the proper manner, with the words "Railroad Crossing" printed in large letters on each side thereof, was a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Southern Railway, Carolina Div.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Prescott v. Hines, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Littlejohn v. Richmond & Danville R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Glenn v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Funderburk v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Peagler v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Bingham v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Reines v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API