Legal Opinion

Funderburk v. Powell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1936No. 14354PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice] FishburnE.

This is an action to recover actual damages for injuries received in a collision between an automobile occupied by the plaintiff and a train of the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company, which was stationary at the time of the collission. The railroad company is sued in the name of its receivers, but for convenience it will be referred to as the defendant. The case does not involve the violation of any statute or municipal ordinance, but is founded solely on common-law negligence.

The accident occurred on December 7, 1931, between 9…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. Chisolm v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Robison v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Dean v. Pennsylvania R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Broberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Marks v. I. M. Pearlstine & SonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Ayers v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Chapman v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Bingham v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API