Legal Opinion

People v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 23, 1990No. 89SA203PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This is an interlocutory appeal by the prosecution pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1989 Supp.) and C.A.R. 4.1. The trial court found that certain statements including a written confession given by the defendant James H. McIntyre to the police were involuntary and ordered their suppression. We affirm the ruling of the trial court.

I

After receiving reports that the defendant had sexually abused his three-year-old son, Detective Wayne Weyler of the Adams *1109County Sheriffs Department attempted to contact McIntyre. When McIntyre was told by his mother that Weyler wanted to talk to him,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API