People v. McIntyre
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This is an interlocutory appeal by the prosecution pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1989 Supp.) and C.A.R. 4.1. The trial court found that certain statements including a written confession given by the defendant James H. McIntyre to the police were involuntary and ordered their suppression. We affirm the ruling of the trial court.
I
After receiving reports that the defendant had sexually abused his three-year-old son, Detective Wayne Weyler of the Adams *1109County Sheriffs Department attempted to contact McIntyre. When McIntyre was told by his mother that Weyler wanted to talk to him,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.