United States v. Louis Ballone, Robert Weitzsacker, Andrew Jezowski and Gaillard B. Radcliffe
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Robert Weitzsacker and Andrew Jezowski appeal pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 9(b) the district court’s denial of release pending their appeal from convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy. They argue that the district court’s application of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3143(b), in denying their motions for release violated the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution. Holding that the Bail Reform Act of 1984 is properly applied to criminal defendants seeking release pending appeal of their convictions after the effective date of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Francis Martin Giancola and Charles A. Pifer, IICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Jose M. Fernandez-Toledo, Lazara E. Rodriguez-Sensat, Carlos S. Lahera- Gonzalez, and Rafael E. FranjulCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Emerson MoltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Hubert T. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. S. Sam CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Mark Allan BaykoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Cortez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- In re HamelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- VALDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.