United States v. Jose M. Fernandez-Toledo, Lazara E. Rodriguez-Sensat, Carlos S. Lahera- Gonzalez, and Rafael E. Franjul
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
I. The Facts Underlying the Controversy
The appellees in this ease were arrested and indicted for engaging in drug trafficking and racketeering. 1 A magistrate set bail for Rodriguez-Sensat and Lahera-Gonzalez and denied bail to Fernandez-Toledo and Franjul. The district judge reviewing the bail determination set bail for Fernandez-Toledo and Franjul and lowered the amount of bail set for Rodriguez-Sensat and Lahera-Gonzalez. 2 The government, fearing that government witnesses would be harmed if Fernandez-Toledo and Franjul were released, 3 attempted to appeal the district court’s bail order,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Patrick T. VanellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Fernandez-ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HowseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- Greer v. SkilcraftDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
- Trina L. BAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Tony Gasaway, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.