Legal Opinion

State v. Hardesty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2003No. 72633-7PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Petitioner State of Washington seeks review of a decision by the Court of Appeals reversing and dismissing Herbert Hardesty’s conviction for residential burglary based on a violation of his right to speedy trial under CrR 3.3(c)(2). The Court of Appeals held that a defendant who is detained in another county on an unrelated charge is “detained in jail” for purposes of CrR 3.3(c)(2)(ii). We hold that a defendant is “detained in jail” for purposes of commencing “time elapsed in district court” if, at the time the State files a complaint, the defendant is detained on that current charge. Since…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. State v. HuffmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HuffmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API