Iauch v. de Socarras
New Jersey Court of Chancery
In the matter of the petition of Mulligan & Brazo to be admitted as parties complainant. On motion to vacate an order admitting said petitioners as parties complainant in the suit.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, V. C.
The original bill in this cause was filed on the 8th of February, 1896. It is based upon a judgment recovered by the complainant, Iauch, against Mrs. Pauline de Socarras on the 6th of February (two days before the filing of the bill), in the supreme court of this state, and an execution issued forthwith thereon, levied by the sheriff of Monmouth county upon certain lands described in the bill. It sets forth that Mrs. de Socarras was seized of the premises in her own right prior to the recovery of the judgmant, and after incurring the indebtedness which was its foundation, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Lister v. ListerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
- Trenton Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. CookNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCord v. W.A. NaboursTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Central-Penn, Bank v. N.J. FidelityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Nunnelly v. First Federal Bldg. Loan Ass'n of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Wild v. Noblesville Building, Loan Fund & Savings InstitutionIndiana Supreme Court · 1899