McCord v. W.A. Nabours
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Milam County. For the previous history of this case see Habours v. McCord, .36 Texas Civil Appeals, 504; 75 S. W. Rep., 827; 82 S. W. Rep., 153, 193, 661; McCord v. ISTabours, 97 Texas, 271; ISTabours v. McCord, 97 Texas, 527; ISTabours v. McCord, 100 Texas, 456; ISTabours v. McCord, 103 S. W. Rep., 469.
1Opinion of the Court
For the purposes of this opinion the following statement of the case and of the facts will suffice.
Crawford Crawford and the Milam County Bank made a general assignment of their property for the benefit of their creditors, appointing. T.S. Henderson and A.P. McCord assignees, who qualified according to law and took charge of the property. After a partial administration of the estate, a committee of the creditors, acting with the assignees, made a schedule of all the property remaining undisposed of and placed upon each item of property a price at which the assignees were authorized to sell…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Boothe v. FiestTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Nabours v. McCordTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Mixon v. Cora MilesTexas Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Su Inn Ho v. University of Texas at Arlington, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Cavitt v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- D. Sullivan & Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.